Here we will describe several tools and strategies for profiling Python code. These are generally in order from simplest to most complex, and we recommend that you also profile your application in a similar order.
Keep it simple
Often a simple tool can provide almost as much information as a complex tool with far less headache.
Python has a nice, built-in statistical profiler called cProfile. You can use it to collect data from your program without having to manually add any instrumentation. You can then visualize the data you collected with several tools. Two in particular, SnakeViz and gprof2dot, will be described in later sections.
cProfile can be used to collect data for a single process or many processes (for a Python code using mpi4py, for example.)
We will start with an example to profile a single process. In this example, we will profile a Python application on Cori and transfer the results to our local machine to visualize. This example will generate a .prof file which contains the data we ultimately want.
Make sure you have done
module load python or otherwise sourced Python in your environment. Also make sure you have requested a compute node:
salloc -A your_repo -N 1 -t 60 -C haswell --qos=interactive
Now you can run you application and collect data using cProfile:
python -m cProfile -o output.prof path/to/your/script arg1 arg2
Once your application is done running you can use scp or Globus to transfer the output.prof file to your local machine.
Now let's examine a more complex case in which we profile several processes from a Python program using mpi4py based on this page. We might want to do this to check that we are adequately load-balancing among the MPI ranks, for example. This example will write many
cpu_0.prof files; one for each MPI rank. To avoid making a mess we recommend creating a new directory for your results and cd into this directory before running your application. This will also write some human-readable
cpu_0.txt files (which are nice as a sanity-check but ultimately not as useful).
You will need to modify the beginning of your script by adding:
import cProfile, sys from mpi4py.MPI import COMM_WORLD
You will also need to surround the part of your script that calls the main function with:
pr = cProfile.Profile() pr.enable() YOUR MAIN FUNCTION pr.disable()
And then at the end of your program, you should add:
# Dump results: # - for binary dump pr.dump_stats('cpu_%d.prof' %comm.rank) # - for text dump with open( 'cpu_%d.txt' %comm.rank, 'w') as output_file: sys.stdout = output_file pr.print_stats( sort='time' ) sys.stdout = sys.__stdout__
Now you can run your script as you would normally (i.e. no cProfile command is required):
python /path/to/your/script arg1 arg2
This modification will make your application write results to both a .prof file and a .txt file for each mpi rank. Then you can use scp or globus to transfer the output files to your local machine for further analysis.
Now that we have created a .prof file (or files) it's time to visualize the data. One browser-based option for this is SnakeViz.
You can install SnakeViz using pip:
pip install snakeviz
Then in a command line, navigate to the directory where your .prof file is located, and type:
This should open an interactive window in your default browser that displays the data in your .prof file. By default data are displayed in a sunburst plot:
The call-stack depth can be adjusted to show deeper functions. You can also click on a particular function which will generate a new plot with the selected function now at the center.
Data can also be displayed in an icicle plot:
SnakeViz also creates a table listing the most expensive functions in the call-stack in descending order:
Another option for visualizing data in a .prof file is gprof2dot. gprof2dot differs from SnakeViz in that it writes static image files (usually .png) which are perhaps easier to view and share than their browswer-based cousins, but they are also not interactive.
gprof2dot displays the data in dot-graph format. Embedded in this graph is also the call-stack information. With gprof2dot it is easier to visualize the typical flow of your application than it is in SnakeViz.
To use gprof2dot, you must also have graphviz installed.
apt-get install python3 graphviz
yum install python3 graphviz
Then you can install gprof2dot using pip install:
pip install gprof2dot
If you're on Cori
If you are installing these on Cori, rather than your own machine, don't forget to append
--user to the end of your install commands. Note that you should NOT do this if you're using your own Conda environment.
Note that for gprof2dot to work correctly, you should have also run your application with Python 3 instead of Python 2. (You could also run with both in Python 2, but don't do that, Python 2 support is going to expire in 2020!) Note that you also need to either copy the gprof2dot.py file to the directory in which you will run the command, or you will need to add it to your search path through something like:
To generate the gprof2dot dot files from cProfile .prof data:
python3 gprof2dot.py -f pstats output.prof | dot -Tpng -o output.png
For this to work you need to make sure you have done
module load python or somehow sourced Python in your environment.
A typical gprof2dot image created from the same .prof data used in the SnakeViz section above is shown below.
If you have an MPI application and have created many .prof files, you can use shell script magic to gprof2dot your data in a single command. Navigate to the directory in which your .prof files are located and:
for i in `seq 0 67`; do python3 gprof2dot.py -f pstats cpu_$i.prof | dot -Tpng -o cpu_$i.png; done
How many files would you like?
In this example, we wrote 68 files, one for each KNL cpu. For Haswell you should change the number 67 to 31 (Haswell has 32 cpus per node), or to whatever number of files you would like to process.
Once you have discovered where the expensive parts of your application are, it is probably time for another tool called line_profiler. This is a particularly handy tool because it gives line-by-line performance information for a selected function.
Don't get ahead of yourself
We recommend not starting with line_profiler right away, however, because the user must decorate the functions for which he or she would like to profile to get information. It is usually both slow and impractical to manually decorate all functions of interest. It is better to know already which functions are the most expensive (like _xypix is in our examples above).
line_profiler can be installed with pip:
pip install line_profiler
Like with gprof2dot, you must either move the kernprof.py script to the directly in which you will execute line_profiler, or you must add kernprof.py to your PYTHONPATH:
Then you must manually decorate the function you would like profiling information for. In our case we will decorate the function _xypix:
@profile def _xypix(arg1,arg2,arg3) """ DESI sample function """ return result
Once you have decorated the functions for which you would like line-by-line performance data, you can run kernprof:
python kernprof.py -l script_to_profile.py
This will write an output file with the name of your script, i.e.
You'll need one more step before you get nice, human-readable output:
python -m line_profiler script_to_profile.lprof > line_profiler_out.txt
If you get a blank file as an output, it's most likely because you forgot to decorate any functions.
Here is the line_profiler output for our expensive function _xypix:
Intel Vtune is best used after other types of profiling have been able to give you some idea what your problem (or problems) are. For example, do you have some lines of code that are slow for reasons you don't understand? Do you spend a lot of time in MPI calls? Do you have a load-imbalance problem (i.e. one of your MPI ranks is working much harder than the others)? If so it is likely time to start using heftier tools like Vtune and Tau (described in the next section).
Vtune shines in that it can tell if you memory access problems are slowing you down, where your MPI overhead is coming from, and if any MPI functions that have an explicit (or implicit) barrier are causing unnecessary waiting in your application.
Vtune has limited Python support
Unfortunately Vtune has limited functionality for Python applications: only three types of collection modes are currently supported:
- hotspots (general performance overview)
- memory-consumption (memory-specific information)
- locksandwaits (threading analysis)
To use Vtune on Cori, first
module load vtune
Note that Vtune can be split into two parts: collection mode and finalization mode. Cori Haswell nodes are fast enough so that usually there's no need to separate these steps. However, Cori KNL nodes can be very slow during the finalization step, so in some cases it may make sense to collect data on KNL but finalize later on Haswell.
The example we will show is for Haswell. Is is broken into two steps, so for KNL, just perform the collection on KNL but finalize on Haswell. In this example our Python binary file is desi_extract_spectra. The Vtune flags we have chosen to use are explained below.
To start collecting data with Vtune, request an interactive node, and try:
srun -n 32 -c 2 amplxe-cl -collect hotspots -r results_dir -trace-mpi -search-dir bin:= /global/cscratch1/sd/stephey/git_repo/desispec/bin/desi_extract_spectra -finalization-mode=none arg1 arg2 arg3
Vtune may complain but don't panic
You may see various warnings and complaints from Vtune but as long as it prints
amplxe: Collection started you should most likely be collecting data.
Some further explanation for why we use these arguments:
- -collect hotspots tells Vtune which of the 3 possible collection modes to use
- -trace-mpi asks to collect MPI data. If you don't have an MPI application, don't add this flag.
- -r results_dir tells Vtune to write results to the specified directory (which doesn't have to exist). Note also that Vtune will append the Cori node number to the end of your directory, i.e. results_dir.nid00058.
- -search-dir is important for Python applications in particular because it instructs Vtune where to look for the scripts or binary files you are using. If you don't specify search-dir and have trouble getting call-stack information, this might be the issue.
- -finalization-mode=none instructs Vtune to skip the finalization step (especially good for KNL)
Once you have collected your data, you can finalize:
amplxe-cl -finalize -r <results_dir.nid00058>
Save yourself some trouble and use NX
At this point we recommend logging on to Cori via NX to view the results in the Vtune GUI. You can also use -X or -Y for ssh forwarding, but it will be very frustratingly slow. As a result we highly reccomend NX for the next steps in this process.
Log onto Cori via NX. Then
module load vtune
to start the Vtune Amplifier GUI. Use the file browser to navigate to the .amplxe file written in your results_dir.nid00058 directory and click open. An overview tab will display some high level results. For more specific information, try selecting the Bottom-up tab. It should look something like:
You can see that in our DESI example, much of the time is spent in MPI calls. This is something that would have been hard to figure out using other methods of profiling.
You can also try selecting the Caller/Callee tab which will display call-stack information about your application. Sometimes it can be difficult to find what you are looking for, especially for Python calls which are often intermixed with much lower-level functions. This is why we recommend profiling with a simpler tool first so you have an idea of what information you are looking for.
Tau is probably the most complex profiler described on this page, but also the most useful.
If you can, build your own Tau
NERSC does offer a pre-built Tau module that you can access using
module load tau but we don't recommend this approach for Python. Tau works best when it is built from scratch under exactly the conditions your application will use. This may sound like a difficult task, but if done carefully, it will produce excellent Tau functionality that will give you a great deal of information about how your Python code performs.
In this example, we will build Tau to profile the same DESI code we have been investigating throughout this page.
Keep things constant when you build Tau
You must configure Tau with exactly the version of Python you will use!
First download and configure Tau with the options that match your needs:
wget http://tau.uoregon.edu/tau.tgz gunzip tau.tgz; tar -xvf tau.tar; cd tau-2.27.1 ./configure -python -mpi -arch=craycnl make install clean -j 8
A word about how we build Tau in this example: we chose the -python flag for our Python application and the -mpi flag since we are using MPI. Also since we are building Tau to use on Cori we specify -arch=craycnl since Cori is a Cray machine. Then we configure Tau with these options. The -j specifies to use 8 processors to configure Tau, but please don't exceed this number (doing so will really make things miserable for other users on your login node-- don't be that person).
Once we have successfully configured Tau, we need to set some very important environment variables:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/your/conda/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH export PATH=/global/cscratch1/sd/elvis/tau-2.27.1/craycnl/bin:$PATH
Do you have a Python MPI code?
If you have a Python MPI code, you must insert a tau.run() wrapper into your code.
There is still one important step before you can run your Python MPI code. (If you do not have an MPI code you can skip this step.) You will need to edit the highest level function of the program you intend to profile (in our case it is desi_extract_spectra_test.py). At the top of this file you will need to add:
import tau if __name__ == '__main__': args = extract.parse() tau.run("extract.main(args)")
mainis the name of the main function in your job. You MUST add this
tau.run()wrapper to your Python MPI code to enable Tau to profile it.
Now we're ready to run. Request an interactive job. Then either cd into the directory with your Python script (or specify the full path to your script) and try:
time srun -u -n 32 -c 2 tau_python ./desi_extract_spectra_test.py arg1 arg2
Tau may complain, don't panic
Tau may print some error messages like "Error in python later" but seems to successfully profile your application anyway.
Once your application is done running, Tau should have written one (or many, in the case of MPI) profile.0.0.0 files in the directory where you executed your run command.
Use the Tau Paraprof GUI on your local machine
We recommend moving these files to your local machine to use the Tau analysis GUI. (The Tau GUI uses so much memory it will crash NX, so just move the files to your local system. The GUI response will also be much faster.)
To do this we must first pack the files on Cori:
paraprof --pack datafile.ppk
and then use scp or Globus to transfer the files to your local machine.
You should install and configure Tau on whichever machine you will use to view the results. You must also set an environment variable on your local machine to point to your Tau installation. On my mac it looks like:
Once you have configured Tau on your local machine you can now unpack the files we transferred from Cori:
paraprof --dump datafile.ppk
Once you have unpacked the files you can type
paraprof in your command prompt in the directory with your unpacked files. This should start the Tau Paraprof GUI. It should open a window that looks something like:
Clicking on one of the functions will open another window which shows how much execution time is spent on this function (in our case, our friend _xypix) for each MPI rank. It also displays the max, min, and standard deviation.
You can also click on a node number (but really, this should be labelled as rank number) and it will open another window which shows a top-down list of time spent in functions for this rank. It should look something like:
Using the custom-built Tau functionality makes it easy to see exactly what your Python program is doing, particularly if it is an MPI program. In our case we can see that only 20 of the 32 ranks are actually doing any work, which leads to a lot of wasted execution time. (Note that Vtune also indicated this, but it was much more difficult to understand why exactly this was happening.) For the ranks that are doing some work, it is good to see that they are relatively load-balanced. If they were not, this would be an easy way to see that their workload needs to be distributed more effectively.
Tau has many additional features and functionality which are not described here (including tracing, which shows the performance of your application as a function of time). These may be worth investigating depending on your particular Python profiling needs.
Hopefully at this point you have a better understanding of where your Python program is spending its time and why. Happy troubleshooting!